Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75091 - 75100 of 83788 for simple case search.
Search results 75091 - 75100 of 83788 for simple case search.
Michael Solomon v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Committee. The issue is whether the committee acted properly in resentencing Solomon after his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12940 - 2005-03-31
Committee. The issue is whether the committee acted properly in resentencing Solomon after his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12940 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Axelson
the circumstances of the case. We rejected that portion of Axelson's ineffectiveness argument. Id., slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
the circumstances of the case. We rejected that portion of Axelson's ineffectiveness argument. Id., slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. This case involves a dispute between a father and his son over a parcel of land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59100 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. This case involves a dispute between a father and his son over a parcel of land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59100 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by the impact of the crime
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by the impact of the crime
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
State v. Johnny K.
was rescheduled for a date in September 1998, but the case had to be adjourned because the State Public Defender’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15497 - 2005-03-31
was rescheduled for a date in September 1998, but the case had to be adjourned because the State Public Defender’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15497 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to pursue the sentencing issue. And, Starlin does not provide us with any case law to the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42750 - 2009-10-28
to pursue the sentencing issue. And, Starlin does not provide us with any case law to the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42750 - 2009-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS
at their school and sporting activities. Id., ¶¶16 and 21. ¶7 In this case, the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30796 - 2007-11-06
at their school and sporting activities. Id., ¶¶16 and 21. ¶7 In this case, the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30796 - 2007-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
in [this conduct]. And that it maybe, and probably was the result of disordered thinking. And if that’s the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42966 - 2009-11-02
in [this conduct]. And that it maybe, and probably was the result of disordered thinking. And if that’s the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42966 - 2009-11-02
CA Blank Order
, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by the age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101917 - 2013-10-13
, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by the age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101917 - 2013-10-13
State v. William J. Wocelka
of a case merit the imposition of a sentence under one of the penalty enhancing paragraphs, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10236 - 2005-03-31
of a case merit the imposition of a sentence under one of the penalty enhancing paragraphs, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10236 - 2005-03-31