Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7511 - 7520 of 50071 for our.

[PDF] Mark B. Evans v. Dan Bertrand
Our scope of review is identical to the circuit court’s on certiorari. See State ex rel. Staples v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5447 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kenneth Haug
to exercise our independent authority to grant a new trial in the interest of justice under § 752.35, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10018 - 2017-09-19

State v. Gerald D. Taylor
original motion or appeal. The reason for this is that we need finality in our litigation. Id., 185 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
approved the plat that included the public access. Id., ¶9. Based on our reading of Wis. Stat. § 236.29(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114928 - 2014-06-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 814.245 (2019-20).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514422 - 2022-04-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a Machner hearing.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617542 - 2023-02-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
imposed, but Walker’s response does not address the sentencing issue. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132842 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gene Renzoni
cause. ¶6 So, we begin our analysis with the Seibel case. There, we find five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3072 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18

COURT OF APPEALS
) sets forth the standard that applies to our review of a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48942 - 2010-04-13