Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7511 - 7520 of 76860 for see.

[PDF] Lawrence Pieczynski v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14753 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, but it does not replace the colloquy. See State v. Pegeese, 2019 WI 60, ¶36, 387 Wis. 2d 119, 928 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987090 - 2025-07-22

State v. Theiss L. Coleman
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2461 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546983 - 2022-07-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175492 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas J. Haydock
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11664 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14);1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147358 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] County of Dane v. Scott E. Pernot
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2603 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rocky A. Knoble
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14824 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David W. Oakley
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16335 - 2017-09-21