Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75151 - 75160 of 83787 for simple case search.
Search results 75151 - 75160 of 83787 for simple case search.
State v. James F. Emerich
of counsel in a postconviction hearing. The State conceded in that case that the prosecutor’s recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2360 - 2005-03-31
of counsel in a postconviction hearing. The State conceded in that case that the prosecutor’s recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2360 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. This case involves a dispute between a father and his son over a parcel of land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59100 - 2011-01-19
PER CURIAM. This case involves a dispute between a father and his son over a parcel of land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59100 - 2011-01-19
State v. Travis E. Blanks
. That statute reads as follows: 973.13 Excessive sentence, errors cured. In any case where the court imposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20872 - 2015-03-09
. That statute reads as follows: 973.13 Excessive sentence, errors cured. In any case where the court imposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20872 - 2015-03-09
CA Blank Order
, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by the age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101917 - 2013-09-17
, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by the age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101917 - 2013-09-17
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
a “written receipt of the appeal.” That occurred in this case, in the form of a letter which also stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
a “written receipt of the appeal.” That occurred in this case, in the form of a letter which also stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the amount of restitution due. We reverse and remand. ¶2 We need not reiterate the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107304 - 2005-03-31
the amount of restitution due. We reverse and remand. ¶2 We need not reiterate the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107304 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
not control this case. Here, the evidence before the circuit court indicated that Ross’ harassing contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27118 - 2006-11-14
not control this case. Here, the evidence before the circuit court indicated that Ross’ harassing contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27118 - 2006-11-14
CA Blank Order
consideration of probation I think would be just ridiculous under the circumstances of this case.” The ten
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98450 - 2013-06-24
consideration of probation I think would be just ridiculous under the circumstances of this case.” The ten
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98450 - 2013-06-24
State v. Jack L. B.
of those factors are that the evidence is material to an issue in the case, and that it creates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31
of those factors are that the evidence is material to an issue in the case, and that it creates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
DNA surcharge. The potential issue is not currently preserved for appellate review in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134592 - 2008-04-23
DNA surcharge. The potential issue is not currently preserved for appellate review in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134592 - 2008-04-23