Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7521 - 7530 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 7521 - 7530 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Stephen S.
contact with his daughter.” Arguing in support of Stephen's motion in limine before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
contact with his daughter.” Arguing in support of Stephen's motion in limine before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction No. 2012AP42-CR 2 relief.1 Tallie argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88163 - 2014-09-15
motion for postconviction No. 2012AP42-CR 2 relief.1 Tallie argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88163 - 2014-09-15
State v. David Lee Miller
in the State’s custody for other reasons. State v. Harris, 174 Wis. 2d 367, 377, 497 N.W.2d 742 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
in the State’s custody for other reasons. State v. Harris, 174 Wis. 2d 367, 377, 497 N.W.2d 742 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. 2 On counsel’s motion, we granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144685 - 2017-09-21
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. 2 On counsel’s motion, we granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144685 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Lee Miller
-eight-hour requirement does not apply to those already in the State’s custody for other reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25540 - 2017-09-21
-eight-hour requirement does not apply to those already in the State’s custody for other reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25540 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
motion, whether Mendoza’s plea was freely, voluntarily and knowingly entered, and whether the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94285 - 2013-03-19
motion, whether Mendoza’s plea was freely, voluntarily and knowingly entered, and whether the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94285 - 2013-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Tallie argues his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88163 - 2012-10-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Tallie argues his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88163 - 2012-10-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Spaude argued he was in custody when the police questioned him, but the police did not advise him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204609 - 2017-12-05
. Spaude argued he was in custody when the police questioned him, but the police did not advise him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204609 - 2017-12-05
[PDF]
Certification
in an unreasonably high volume of speculative motions for ultimately non-exculpatory postconviction DNA testing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102552 - 2017-09-21
in an unreasonably high volume of speculative motions for ultimately non-exculpatory postconviction DNA testing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102552 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 his motion to dismiss the charges against him based on the destruction of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887952 - 2024-12-11
-CR 2 his motion to dismiss the charges against him based on the destruction of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887952 - 2024-12-11