Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7521 - 7530 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7521 - 7530 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
State v. Anthony W. Freeman
erroneous. We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20241 - 2005-12-21
erroneous. We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20241 - 2005-12-21
State v. Dennis J. Porter
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10576 - 2005-03-31
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10576 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daryl Thomas Griffin
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14811 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14811 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15
City of Sheboygan v. Tiffany M. Brock
of a statute or ordinance is a question of law and is subject to our de novo review. See Hemerley v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16270 - 2005-03-31
of a statute or ordinance is a question of law and is subject to our de novo review. See Hemerley v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16270 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review de novo. State v. Hess, 2010 WI 82, ¶19, 327 Wis. 2d 524, 785 N.W.2d 568. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113224 - 2014-06-03
review de novo. State v. Hess, 2010 WI 82, ¶19, 327 Wis. 2d 524, 785 N.W.2d 568. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113224 - 2014-06-03
State v. Richard A. Edwards
the arresting officer could have obtained a breath test instead. We decide the issue de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
the arresting officer could have obtained a breath test instead. We decide the issue de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
City of Middleton v. James H. Parkin
review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis.2d 222, 225, 496 N.W.2d 177, 179 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10120 - 2013-06-03
review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis.2d 222, 225, 496 N.W.2d 177, 179 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10120 - 2013-06-03
State v. Oscar Jasper
of the proper venue for an action is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Young, 139 Wis. 2d 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2824 - 2005-03-31
of the proper venue for an action is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Young, 139 Wis. 2d 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2824 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wade L.
review de novo. See State ex rel. Grant v. Department of Corrections, 192 Wis.2d 298, 303, 531 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9106 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State ex rel. Grant v. Department of Corrections, 192 Wis.2d 298, 303, 531 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9106 - 2005-03-31