Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7521 - 7530 of 41752 for new88v.net 💥🏹 new88 💥🏹 new 88 💥🏹 new88vnet 💥🏹 nha cai new88 💥🏹 new88v.net.

COURT OF APPEALS
) the postsentencing determination of restitution was a new factor. We affirm. I. ¶2 In March of 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51614 - 2010-07-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing hearing constituted an implicit request for new counsel and the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248157 - 2019-10-08

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Barnes
modification of his sentence based upon an alleged new factor. He relied upon a reassessment of his risk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13395 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Training resources News For the media Headlines The Third Branch Media coordinators Media resources
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=805&year=2016

Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Training resources News For the media Headlines The Third Branch Media coordinators Media resources
/news/thirdbranch/july22/adams.htm - 2026-05-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence warranted a new trial. The circuit court denied the motion and M.T.W. appeals this as well. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=408212 - 2021-08-11

[PDF] State v. Frederick B. Rogers
, and the order denying his motion for sentence modification on two grounds: (1) that a “new factor” existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4316 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a “new factor”—he claims that at the 2011 hearing, the circuit court was not aware that the DOC had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304209 - 2020-11-18

State v. Frederick B. Rogers
, and the order denying his motion for sentence modification on two grounds: (1) that a “new factor” existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4316 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. J.B. Franklin, Jr.
postconviction motion to modify his sentence based on a new factor; and (2) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10145 - 2017-09-19