Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7521 - 7530 of 50070 for our.
Search results 7521 - 7530 of 50070 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2005AP777, unpublished slip op. at 2 (WI App Feb. 12, 2007). Our reversal and remand on the sleeping juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16
, No. 2005AP777, unpublished slip op. at 2 (WI App Feb. 12, 2007). Our reversal and remand on the sleeping juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law for our de novo review. State v. White, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law for our de novo review. State v. White, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
State v. Patricia E. K.
to apply the balancing test put forth in Phifer v. State, 64 Wis. 2d 24, 218 N.W.2d 354 (1974), where our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
to apply the balancing test put forth in Phifer v. State, 64 Wis. 2d 24, 218 N.W.2d 354 (1974), where our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
report. Following our independent review of the record, we affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
report. Following our independent review of the record, we affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
State v. John P. McWilliams
503. A reasonable possibility is a possibility sufficient to undermine our confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6367 - 2005-03-31
503. A reasonable possibility is a possibility sufficient to undermine our confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerod J. Bins
of our own records revealed that we have previously addressed and rejected Bins’s arguments. In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4061 - 2017-09-20
of our own records revealed that we have previously addressed and rejected Bins’s arguments. In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4061 - 2017-09-20
State v. Joseph D. Minkin
A discussion of this issue must begin with our supreme court’s decision in State v. Martin, 162 Wis. 2d 883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6445 - 2005-03-31
A discussion of this issue must begin with our supreme court’s decision in State v. Martin, 162 Wis. 2d 883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶2 As a preliminary matter, our citation to and reliance upon State v. Spaulding, No. 2006AP566
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29938 - 2014-09-15
. ¶2 As a preliminary matter, our citation to and reliance upon State v. Spaulding, No. 2006AP566
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29938 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 366 (Ct. App. 1988) (we will not abandon our neutrality to develop arguments). However, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88801 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 366 (Ct. App. 1988) (we will not abandon our neutrality to develop arguments). However, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88801 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appellate issues. 2 As part of our independent review, we have considered each of these areas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186779 - 2017-09-21
appellate issues. 2 As part of our independent review, we have considered each of these areas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186779 - 2017-09-21