Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75231 - 75240 of 84491 for simple case search.
Search results 75231 - 75240 of 84491 for simple case search.
City of Fond du Lac v. John Binotto
n.2, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981). In that case, Wertz contended that “the trial court committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5890 - 2005-03-31
n.2, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981). In that case, Wertz contended that “the trial court committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5890 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
it was then in existence, when it decided where his case fell in the sentencing guidelines. Assuming for the sake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110000 - 2014-04-07
it was then in existence, when it decided where his case fell in the sentencing guidelines. Assuming for the sake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110000 - 2014-04-07
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources v. Brian Parrott
with the circuit court that this case is appropriately disposed of by summary judgment. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5669 - 2005-03-31
with the circuit court that this case is appropriately disposed of by summary judgment. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5669 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald G. Nadolski
decision is law of the case. See Univest Corp. v. General Split Corp., 148 Wis. 2d 29, 38, 435 N.W.2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15788 - 2005-03-31
decision is law of the case. See Univest Corp. v. General Split Corp., 148 Wis. 2d 29, 38, 435 N.W.2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15788 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Dorschner
arguments Dorschner makes in this case. This court concluded that the supreme court’s decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2551 - 2005-03-31
arguments Dorschner makes in this case. This court concluded that the supreme court’s decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
communications with the victim-witness case manager, was not admitted as evidence. However, again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129892 - 2026-06-11
communications with the victim-witness case manager, was not admitted as evidence. However, again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129892 - 2026-06-11
[PDF]
Mayville Die & Tool, Inc. v. Weller Machinery Company
conclude that § 100.18(1) is inapplicable to the facts of this case, and that the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4048 - 2017-09-20
conclude that § 100.18(1) is inapplicable to the facts of this case, and that the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4048 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Larry F. Reynolds v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
discontinuance. They contend that, in this case, “an alteration of an existing road constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6471 - 2017-09-19
discontinuance. They contend that, in this case, “an alteration of an existing road constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6471 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). Based on Dukes’ failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070449 - 2026-01-27
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). Based on Dukes’ failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070449 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forth the procedural history of the case and addresses the validity of Saari’s plea and sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
forth the procedural history of the case and addresses the validity of Saari’s plea and sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03