Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75281 - 75290 of 77417 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75281 - 75290 of 77417 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to amend the original judgment of conviction. He noted that the sexual assault charge had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104442 - 2017-09-21
motion to amend the original judgment of conviction. He noted that the sexual assault charge had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104442 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of judgment on a speeding forfeiture.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
of judgment on a speeding forfeiture.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237981 - 2019-03-21
that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237981 - 2019-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.07(1) permits a court to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or stipulation for enumerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
. § 806.07(1) permits a court to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or stipulation for enumerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
State v. Jarrell E. Hurley
to the ninety days of jail time imposed as a condition of probation in count one. The amended judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18691 - 2005-06-28
to the ninety days of jail time imposed as a condition of probation in count one. The amended judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18691 - 2005-06-28
Terri A. Birt v. Anne Marie Bonkowski
court itself stated that the issue was similar to a summary judgment. This is not a finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5345 - 2005-03-31
court itself stated that the issue was similar to a summary judgment. This is not a finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5345 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
there is a recommendation of concurrent. I’m not changing the judgment of conviction. I think he got exactly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
there is a recommendation of concurrent. I’m not changing the judgment of conviction. I think he got exactly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment. See State v. Segner, No. 1999AP935-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Jan. 13, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57175 - 2014-09-15
the judgment. See State v. Segner, No. 1999AP935-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Jan. 13, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57175 - 2014-09-15
Arlandis Issac v. Gerald A. Berge
will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19753 - 2005-09-28
will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19753 - 2005-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there is a recommendation of concurrent. I’m not changing the judgment of conviction. I think he got exactly what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108402 - 2017-09-21
there is a recommendation of concurrent. I’m not changing the judgment of conviction. I think he got exactly what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108402 - 2017-09-21