Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7531 - 7540 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7531 - 7540 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph A. Roe
by the record. Whether there was probable cause for Roe’s arrest is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10637 - 2017-09-20
by the record. Whether there was probable cause for Roe’s arrest is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10637 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Charles G.K.
this court reviews de novo. Wisconsin Hosp. Ass'n v. Natural Resources Bd., 156 Wis.2d 688, 705, 457 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9809 - 2017-09-19
this court reviews de novo. Wisconsin Hosp. Ass'n v. Natural Resources Bd., 156 Wis.2d 688, 705, 457 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9809 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ernest J. P., Jr.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda M. Van de water, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26123 - 2006-08-08
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda M. Van de water, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26123 - 2006-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Johnny L. Thomas
of Thomas in shackles, we conclude that the prejudice was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13192 - 2017-09-21
of Thomas in shackles, we conclude that the prejudice was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13192 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
, a conclusion of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
, a conclusion of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
is procedurally barred is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Allen, 2010 WI 89, ¶15, 328
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132247 - 2015-08-18
is procedurally barred is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Allen, 2010 WI 89, ¶15, 328
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132247 - 2015-08-18
Eau Claire County v. Craig M. Mader
requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18255 - 2005-05-23
requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18255 - 2005-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36188 - 2009-04-15
. Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36188 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Cook v. Public Storage, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Cook v. Public Storage, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village of Menomonee Falls v. Meyer, 229 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48251 - 2010-03-24
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village of Menomonee Falls v. Meyer, 229 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48251 - 2010-03-24