Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7531 - 7540 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7531 - 7540 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 51.20(11)(a), which presents a question of law we review de novo. See R.J.O., 392 Wis. 2d 157, ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301430 - 2020-11-04
. § 51.20(11)(a), which presents a question of law we review de novo. See R.J.O., 392 Wis. 2d 157, ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301430 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that I review de novo. Portage Cty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260728 - 2020-05-21
is a question of law that I review de novo. Portage Cty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260728 - 2020-05-21
State v. Ernest J. P., Jr.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda M. Van de water, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26123 - 2006-08-08
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda M. Van de water, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26123 - 2006-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
, a conclusion of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
, a conclusion of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
Eau Claire County v. Craig M. Mader
requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18255 - 2005-05-23
requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18255 - 2005-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36188 - 2009-04-15
. Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36188 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Cook v. Public Storage, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Cook v. Public Storage, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
State v. William T. Anderson
erroneous, but we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. At the time of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25720 - 2006-07-04
erroneous, but we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. At the time of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25720 - 2006-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of law and fact. Interpretation of a contract is a question of law reviewed de novo, but the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133129 - 2015-01-20
of law and fact. Interpretation of a contract is a question of law reviewed de novo, but the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133129 - 2015-01-20
Timothy Oddsen v. City of Milwaukee
the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo. See Garcia v. Regent Ins. Co., 167 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12845 - 2005-03-31
the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo. See Garcia v. Regent Ins. Co., 167 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12845 - 2005-03-31