Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75301 - 75310 of 77417 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75301 - 75310 of 77417 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.07(1) permits a court to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or stipulation for enumerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
. § 806.07(1) permits a court to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or stipulation for enumerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
State v. Jarrell E. Hurley
to the ninety days of jail time imposed as a condition of probation in count one. The amended judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18691 - 2005-06-28
to the ninety days of jail time imposed as a condition of probation in count one. The amended judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18691 - 2005-06-28
Terri A. Birt v. Anne Marie Bonkowski
court itself stated that the issue was similar to a summary judgment. This is not a finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5345 - 2005-03-31
court itself stated that the issue was similar to a summary judgment. This is not a finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5345 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
there is a recommendation of concurrent. I’m not changing the judgment of conviction. I think he got exactly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
there is a recommendation of concurrent. I’m not changing the judgment of conviction. I think he got exactly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment. See State v. Segner, No. 1999AP935-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Jan. 13, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57175 - 2014-09-15
the judgment. See State v. Segner, No. 1999AP935-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Jan. 13, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57175 - 2014-09-15
Arlandis Issac v. Gerald A. Berge
will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19753 - 2005-09-28
will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19753 - 2005-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there is a recommendation of concurrent. I’m not changing the judgment of conviction. I think he got exactly what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108402 - 2017-09-21
there is a recommendation of concurrent. I’m not changing the judgment of conviction. I think he got exactly what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108402 - 2017-09-21
Walters Family Trust v. Scott Walters
length of time, without prompting, to form a rational judgment in relation to them, the result of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6704 - 2005-03-31
length of time, without prompting, to form a rational judgment in relation to them, the result of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6704 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Hobbs did not timely pursue postconviction relief from his judgments of conviction. Instead, he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
. Hobbs did not timely pursue postconviction relief from his judgments of conviction. Instead, he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755515 - 2024-01-31
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755515 - 2024-01-31