Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7541 - 7550 of 32264 for pretrial conference status.
Search results 7541 - 7550 of 32264 for pretrial conference status.
COURT OF APPEALS
two counts as a repeater. Garrett argues that the circuit court erred by denying his pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38153 - 2009-07-22
two counts as a repeater. Garrett argues that the circuit court erred by denying his pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38153 - 2009-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of the pretrial order, the State was required to provide a transcription of the recordings. The State had given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43011 - 2009-11-10
of the pretrial order, the State was required to provide a transcription of the recordings. The State had given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43011 - 2009-11-10
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Kathryn P. Karlsson
. inquiring as to the status or outcome of his personal injury action, constituted a failure to keep her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16410 - 2017-09-21
. inquiring as to the status or outcome of his personal injury action, constituted a failure to keep her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16410 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The no-merit report addresses whether there are other potential issues relating to the pretrial and trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901312 - 2025-01-16
The no-merit report addresses whether there are other potential issues relating to the pretrial and trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901312 - 2025-01-16
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
On September 20, 1996, the trial court held a pretrial on the OWI charge that Burgeson was facing. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
On September 20, 1996, the trial court held a pretrial on the OWI charge that Burgeson was facing. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sean M. Simpson
Simpson did not appear for a scheduled pretrial hearing. Although not in the appellate record transmitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12202 - 2005-03-31
Simpson did not appear for a scheduled pretrial hearing. Although not in the appellate record transmitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12202 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for sentence credit. He contends he should have received additional sentence credit for pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101500 - 2013-09-03
motion for sentence credit. He contends he should have received additional sentence credit for pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101500 - 2013-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addresses whether the trial court improperly denied Rojas’ pretrial motion to dismiss due to the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244530 - 2019-08-07
addresses whether the trial court improperly denied Rojas’ pretrial motion to dismiss due to the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244530 - 2019-08-07
[PDF]
State v. Sean M. Simpson
not appear for a scheduled pretrial hearing. Although not in the appellate record transmitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12202 - 2017-09-21
not appear for a scheduled pretrial hearing. Although not in the appellate record transmitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12202 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
he should have received additional sentence credit for pretrial confinement and, if he had, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101500 - 2017-09-21
he should have received additional sentence credit for pretrial confinement and, if he had, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101500 - 2017-09-21