Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7541 - 7550 of 12912 for prosecuting.

[PDF] James H. Dumke v.
attorney shall cooperate with the board and the administrator in the investigation, prosecution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17251 - 2017-09-21

State v. Derek E.
prosecutive merit. (c) The adequacy and suitability of facilities, services and procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13319 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecution and further denying the accused his right to liberty.’” See State v. Hooper, 101 Wis. 2d 517, 544
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41869 - 2009-10-05

[PDF] Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
afforded great discretion whether to initiate prosecution in a particular case). While the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10165 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Christopher M. Clutter
with respect to the probability that the results of his prosecution would be different. See § 752.35, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15261 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert E. Koutnik, Jr.
of the criminal justice procedure and system before becoming involved in this prosecution.” It found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4114 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Sean P. Tate
that “‘it is not essential to his conviction that the perpetrator of the principal crime be prosecuted or convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13716 - 2014-09-15

State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
in entering it was to protect his wife from prosecution). When a defendant is given no fair or reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13508 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecution unawares, defense counsel did not divulge either that Bergevain would corroborate Silver’s theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87126 - 2012-09-18

State v. George C. Harrell
uncharged offenses and offenses which have not been prosecuted. State v. Marhal, 172 Wis. 2d 491, 502-03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31