Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7541 - 7550 of 20860 for word.
Search results 7541 - 7550 of 20860 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas B. Brulport
“explosives.” Id. at 159. The court relied on the common understanding of the word, holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9228 - 2017-09-19
“explosives.” Id. at 159. The court relied on the common understanding of the word, holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9228 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
words, the PIP endorsement waived Selective’s contractual right to subrogation as provided elsewhere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954199 - 2025-05-13
words, the PIP endorsement waived Selective’s contractual right to subrogation as provided elsewhere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954199 - 2025-05-13
American National Property and Casualty Company v. Marderos Nersesian
and Marderos signed on January 28, 2002, had the word “VOID” written across its face. ¶11 On October 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7173 - 2005-03-31
and Marderos signed on January 28, 2002, had the word “VOID” written across its face. ¶11 On October 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ervin Burris
prior order”—in other words, as an objection to the initial supervised- release decision. Then, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13204 - 2017-09-21
prior order”—in other words, as an objection to the initial supervised- release decision. Then, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13204 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of sexual contact. Id. However, the verdict forms for those three counts were worded identically. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762853 - 2024-02-14
of sexual contact. Id. However, the verdict forms for those three counts were worded identically. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762853 - 2024-02-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
might not remember “word for word,” she remembered “[p]retty closely.” Gavin then went on to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187321 - 2017-09-21
might not remember “word for word,” she remembered “[p]retty closely.” Gavin then went on to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187321 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the postconviction hearing, the document was titled “Affidavit” at the top and had words purporting to indicate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195018 - 2017-09-21
at the postconviction hearing, the document was titled “Affidavit” at the top and had words purporting to indicate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 253
procedural requirements during the eleven-week period. In other words, the burdens Siciliano contends she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31021 - 2014-09-15
procedural requirements during the eleven-week period. In other words, the burdens Siciliano contends she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31021 - 2014-09-15
Rogers Development, Inc. v. Rock County Planning and Development Committee
and approved usage of the words chosen by the legislature. Wis. Stat. § 990.01(1); see also State v. Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4787 - 2005-03-31
and approved usage of the words chosen by the legislature. Wis. Stat. § 990.01(1); see also State v. Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4787 - 2005-03-31
WR Joint Venture v. Record Town, Inc.
there is no comma separating the nouns following the word “including.” If a comma were placed after “fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11966 - 2005-03-31
there is no comma separating the nouns following the word “including.” If a comma were placed after “fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11966 - 2005-03-31