Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7551 - 7560 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
in the trial court’s decision on his postconviction motion. However, our review is de novo, id. at 634, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5997 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Henry D. Witkowski v. County of Milwaukee
of limitations is a question of law for our de novo review. Shanak v. City of Waupaca, 185 Wis.2d 568, 585, 518
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8474 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the face of a warrant affidavit is de 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108986 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for reconsideration raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211041 - 2018-04-17

John P. Barnes v. Village of Lannon
plan was arbitrary and lacked a rational basis. Our review of a certiorari action is de novo. Peace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19036 - 2005-07-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of the facts to a legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08

Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court Rules - Petitions archive
:1.15 Safekeeping Property; Trust Accounts and Fiduciary Accounts Filed by: Earl Munson and De Ette
/scrules/archive/0803.htm - 2026-03-09

[PDF] John P. Barnes v. Village of Lannon
with the comprehensive plan was arbitrary and lacked a rational basis. Our review of a certiorari action is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19036 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Terrance M. Knickman v. Cecilia Hinojosa
, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). A trial court's legal conclusions are subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8393 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Scott A. Magnuson
the application of law to undisputed facts. It therefore presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13541 - 2017-09-21