Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75531 - 75540 of 77516 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75531 - 75540 of 77516 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court to conform the written judgment of conviction to the oral pronouncement of a five-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116991 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court to conform the written judgment of conviction to the oral pronouncement of a five-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed his judgment of conviction. Since his direct appeal, Tate has sought collateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114105 - 2017-09-21
affirmed his judgment of conviction. Since his direct appeal, Tate has sought collateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114105 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36016 - 2009-03-30
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36016 - 2009-03-30
CA Blank Order
the judgment. State v. Gimino, No. 2012AP1498-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶45 (WI App Mar. 7, 2013). In his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139836 - 2014-04-14
the judgment. State v. Gimino, No. 2012AP1498-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶45 (WI App Mar. 7, 2013). In his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139836 - 2014-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39221 - 2009-08-10
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39221 - 2009-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
] As a matter of law, Celske’s postprobation judgment of conviction is proof of a violation of the rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27129 - 2006-11-14
] As a matter of law, Celske’s postprobation judgment of conviction is proof of a violation of the rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27129 - 2006-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
not appeal the judgment of conviction that resulted from his guilty plea. ¶3 On April 20, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47459 - 2010-03-01
not appeal the judgment of conviction that resulted from his guilty plea. ¶3 On April 20, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47459 - 2010-03-01
State v. Michael R.T.
of the evidence assertion, Michael agrees that an appellate court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14335 - 2005-03-31
of the evidence assertion, Michael agrees that an appellate court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14335 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
457 (1975). IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92741 - 2005-03-31
457 (1975). IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92741 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gilberto Flores
appealed the judgment of conviction and the trial court's sentencing order. This court summarily affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9864 - 2009-10-08
appealed the judgment of conviction and the trial court's sentencing order. This court summarily affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9864 - 2009-10-08