Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 83278 for case search.
State v. Steven W. Nielson
is a search under the Fourth Amendment. County of Milwaukee v. Proegler, 95 Wis. 2d 614, 623, 291 N.W.2d 608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5885 - 2005-03-31
is a search under the Fourth Amendment. County of Milwaukee v. Proegler, 95 Wis. 2d 614, 623, 291 N.W.2d 608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of those issues in addition to our obligation in a no- merit appeal to independently search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44866 - 2014-09-15
of those issues in addition to our obligation in a no- merit appeal to independently search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44866 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
issues in addition to our obligation in a no-merit appeal to independently search the record for any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44866 - 2009-12-21
issues in addition to our obligation in a no-merit appeal to independently search the record for any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44866 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
Lane B. Altmann v. Roger L. Kelber
by reasonable search of the public records and indexes affecting real estate in the offices of the register
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18987 - 2017-09-21
by reasonable search of the public records and indexes affecting real estate in the offices of the register
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Herbert E. Droste v. David H. Schwarz
about whether the officer knew he could have searched Droste’s apartment without a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15671 - 2017-09-21
about whether the officer knew he could have searched Droste’s apartment without a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15671 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
him to a search. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2013-05-13
him to a search. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2013-05-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. State v. Pinkard, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453148 - 2021-11-16
Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. State v. Pinkard, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453148 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742961 - 2023-12-27
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742961 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742961 - 2023-12-27
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742961 - 2023-12-27
State v. James T. Fitzgerald
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0049-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0049-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31