Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 89827 for civil+disposition+summary+county.

[PDF] Robert Kopfhamer v. Madison Gas and Electric Company
, the Kopfhamers filed a civil action against MGE, WPL and WPSC.1 In response, two summary judgment motions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3993 - 2017-09-20

Robert Kopfhamer v. Madison Gas and Electric Company
compensation claim, the Kopfhamers filed a civil action against MGE, WPL and WPSC.[1] In response, two summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3993 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the County’s motion for partial summary judgment on the existence of grounds to terminate CC’s parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263244 - 2020-06-04

[PDF] State v. Ernest L. Smith
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: RAMONA A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11138 - 2017-09-19

State v. Ernest L. Smith
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: RAMONA A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11138 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
: 2021AP1335 State of Wisconsin v. A.G. (L. C. No. 2021JV34) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635289 - 2023-03-21

State v. Mark M. Loutsch
. APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the circuit court for Vernon County: michael j. rosborough, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5432 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mark M. Loutsch
a judgment and orders of the circuit court for Vernon County: MICHAEL J. ROSBOROUGH, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5432 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105351 - 2013-12-10

CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1] We affirm the orders of the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21