Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 68874 for he.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 68874 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Mark W. Albers
), fifth and sixth offenses. His second OWI conviction was charged as a civil forfeiture, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7282 - 2017-09-20
), fifth and sixth offenses. His second OWI conviction was charged as a civil forfeiture, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7282 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he has not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report and conducting an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169757 - 2017-09-21
a response, but he has not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report and conducting an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169757 - 2017-09-21
State v. Phillip K. Adams
for a postconviction hearing to determine whether he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10118 - 2005-03-31
for a postconviction hearing to determine whether he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10118 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that he had a right to respond, but he did not do so. After considering the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105187 - 2013-12-02
that he had a right to respond, but he did not do so. After considering the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105187 - 2013-12-02
State v. Tomas Consuegra
, Consuegra claimed that he did not knowingly and intelligently enter his plea because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11391 - 2005-03-31
, Consuegra claimed that he did not knowingly and intelligently enter his plea because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11391 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for this offense, even though he was simultaneously serving prison sentences for unrelated offenses. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32964 - 2008-06-09
for this offense, even though he was simultaneously serving prison sentences for unrelated offenses. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32964 - 2008-06-09
State v. Mark W. Albers
conviction was charged as a civil forfeiture, and he was not represented by an attorney. However, Albers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7283 - 2005-03-31
conviction was charged as a civil forfeiture, and he was not represented by an attorney. However, Albers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7283 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the circuit court erred in refusing to suppress his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141224 - 2015-05-05
denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the circuit court erred in refusing to suppress his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141224 - 2015-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI-5th), plus a count of operating after revocation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51517 - 2010-06-30
while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI-5th), plus a count of operating after revocation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51517 - 2010-06-30
[PDF]
Robert J. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrange
. He argues on appeal that the hearing examiner did not proceed under a correct theory of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4839 - 2017-09-19
. He argues on appeal that the hearing examiner did not proceed under a correct theory of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4839 - 2017-09-19