Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 50071 for our.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 50071 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
, including the civil litigation at issue in the present case, and not just contested will matters. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74952 - 2011-12-07
, including the civil litigation at issue in the present case, and not just contested will matters. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74952 - 2011-12-07
CA Blank Order
guilty plea. Our review of the Record—including the plea questionnaire, waiver of rights form, and plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99748 - 2013-07-18
guilty plea. Our review of the Record—including the plea questionnaire, waiver of rights form, and plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99748 - 2013-07-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and the record, No. 2023AP593 2 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830250 - 2024-07-25
our review of the briefs and the record, No. 2023AP593 2 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830250 - 2024-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Beard pled guilty to fleeing and two counts of retail theft, our review of the Record and of counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
Beard pled guilty to fleeing and two counts of retail theft, our review of the Record and of counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
not responded. Upon our independent review of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our standard of review is whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
. Our standard of review is whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Bryant E. Carter
N.W.2d 580 (1989). Our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4960 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 580 (1989). Our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4960 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. Stat. § 752.35 (2005-06), we may exercise our discretion and reverse the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28816 - 2007-05-01
Wis. Stat. § 752.35 (2005-06), we may exercise our discretion and reverse the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28816 - 2007-05-01
State v. Eric J. Yelk
that there is no arguable basis to challenge Yelk’s guilty and no contest pleas. Our independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31
that there is no arguable basis to challenge Yelk’s guilty and no contest pleas. Our independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel because counsel failed to call his supervisor as a witness at trial. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22
counsel because counsel failed to call his supervisor as a witness at trial. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22