Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 50071 for our.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 814.245 (2019-20).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514422 - 2022-04-28
. § 814.245 (2019-20).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514422 - 2022-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a Machner hearing.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617542 - 2023-02-07
a Machner hearing.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617542 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
established, as is our standard of review: Probable cause to arrest for operating while under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192830 - 2017-09-21
established, as is our standard of review: Probable cause to arrest for operating while under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192830 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel because counsel failed to call his supervisor as a witness at trial. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22
counsel because counsel failed to call his supervisor as a witness at trial. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in our discussion below. No. 2010AP2811-CR 4 DISCUSSION Jury Instructions ¶7 Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81583 - 2014-09-15
in our discussion below. No. 2010AP2811-CR 4 DISCUSSION Jury Instructions ¶7 Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81583 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed, but Walker’s response does not address the sentencing issue. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132842 - 2017-09-21
imposed, but Walker’s response does not address the sentencing issue. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132842 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gene Renzoni
cause. No. 00-2606-CR 4 ¶6 So, we begin our analysis with the Seibel case. There, we find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3072 - 2017-09-19
cause. No. 00-2606-CR 4 ¶6 So, we begin our analysis with the Seibel case. There, we find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3072 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse unless there is no reasonable basis for the court’s exercise of discretion. Id. Moreover, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178981 - 2017-09-21
will not reverse unless there is no reasonable basis for the court’s exercise of discretion. Id. Moreover, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178981 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gene Renzoni
cause. ¶6 So, we begin our analysis with the Seibel case. There, we find five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3072 - 2005-03-31
cause. ¶6 So, we begin our analysis with the Seibel case. There, we find five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3072 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
not responded. Upon our independent review of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18