Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7561 - 7570 of 20929 for word.

State v. Lonnie C. Davis
crime. In other words, the youth factor does not automatically outweigh all of the other sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7484 - 2005-05-24

Lynda D. Dahlke v. James S. Dahlke
does not mean that another court must do likewise when the judgment is worded differently. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4858 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gary K. Smith v. General Casualty Insurance Company
as "an unidentified" vehicle "involved in a hit and run accident." The use of the word "involved" does not strike
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17411 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Shuron C. Davis
” Hills’s car after Hills and someone in the other car exchanged “some words.” Davis claimed that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4789 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, however, our supreme court has clarified: “[a]lthough cases sometimes use the words ‘forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176103 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of Sheboygan v. City of Sheboygan
, these changes in wording appear to have no substantive effect on the meaning of this statute and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9315 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 116
designated as "Client's Account" or "Trust Account" or words of similar import. No funds belonging
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16522 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Leonard Collins v. Richard N. Polinske
. In other words, Collins in fact received from the PRC the favorable consideration which he had been led
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14314 - 2014-09-15

Leonard Collins v. Richard N. Polinske
on that basis. In other words, Collins in fact received from the PRC the favorable consideration which he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14314 - 2005-03-31

Karen C. Martin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. The Martins concede that if, in the words of their main brief on this appeal, “the ‘regular use’ exclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2969 - 2005-03-31