Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75641 - 75650 of 77516 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75641 - 75650 of 77516 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, with the judgment of conviction reflecting that the circuit court did “not oppose early termination of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150702 - 2017-09-21
, with the judgment of conviction reflecting that the circuit court did “not oppose early termination of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150702 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166614 - 2017-09-21
discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166614 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Not recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6896 - 2005-03-31
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Not recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6896 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Stuckenberg’s various arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A divorce judgment entered in 1993 required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46516 - 2010-02-01
Stuckenberg’s various arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A divorce judgment entered in 1993 required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46516 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is that a notice of appeal “does not bring before the appellate court orders filed after the judgment or order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668903 - 2023-06-20
is that a notice of appeal “does not bring before the appellate court orders filed after the judgment or order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668903 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Vanderhoef’s first problem is that this is an appeal from a reconfinement order. The original judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68388 - 2014-09-15
Vanderhoef’s first problem is that this is an appeal from a reconfinement order. The original judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68388 - 2014-09-15
G-Store, Inc. v. Department of Commerce
or statutory provision. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(8). This court shall not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4182 - 2005-03-31
or statutory provision. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(8). This court shall not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4182 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
substantially revisits the issues he raised in an earlier direct appeal from the judgments in these cases. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29629 - 2007-07-09
substantially revisits the issues he raised in an earlier direct appeal from the judgments in these cases. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29629 - 2007-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
2, 1999, this court summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. ¶3 On October 6, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49245 - 2010-04-26
2, 1999, this court summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. ¶3 On October 6, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49245 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment for the Commission’s as to the weight or credibility of the evidence on any finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30104 - 2014-09-15
judgment for the Commission’s as to the weight or credibility of the evidence on any finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30104 - 2014-09-15