Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7571 - 7580 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 7571 - 7580 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
and from the order denying his postconviction motion. The only issue is whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48771 - 2010-04-12
and from the order denying his postconviction motion. The only issue is whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48771 - 2010-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS
based his motion for a new trial in the interest of justice, arguing that the testimony had prevented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
based his motion for a new trial in the interest of justice, arguing that the testimony had prevented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, both as party to a crime, and an order denying his suppression motion. Wiegand contends he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77607 - 2014-09-15
, both as party to a crime, and an order denying his suppression motion. Wiegand contends he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his postconviction motion. The only issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48771 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his postconviction motion. The only issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48771 - 2014-09-15
Hillary A.H. v. Michael J.B.
in 1979. The sole custody of the couple's two minor children was awarded to Mrs. Harms. Harms, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8315 - 2005-03-31
in 1979. The sole custody of the couple's two minor children was awarded to Mrs. Harms. Harms, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8315 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert J. Trokan
pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification based on the law of new factors.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6532 - 2005-03-31
pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification based on the law of new factors.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Trokan
motion for sentence modification based on the law of new factors. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6532 - 2017-09-19
motion for sentence modification based on the law of new factors. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6532 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
to the public and in need of restrictive custodial treatment. Wis. Stat. § 938.34 (4m). In determining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94444 - 2013-03-26
to the public and in need of restrictive custodial treatment. Wis. Stat. § 938.34 (4m). In determining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94444 - 2013-03-26
Rusk County v. Harold S., Sr.
. § 48.428, the County filed a motion for reconsideration of the sustaining care portion of the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20840 - 2005-12-29
. § 48.428, the County filed a motion for reconsideration of the sustaining care portion of the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20840 - 2005-12-29
[PDF]
State v. David A. Kress
by denying Kress’s motion to suppress that evidence. We affirm. ¶2 A pharmacist in a Dodgeville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6118 - 2017-09-19
by denying Kress’s motion to suppress that evidence. We affirm. ¶2 A pharmacist in a Dodgeville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6118 - 2017-09-19