Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75781 - 75790 of 77333 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75781 - 75790 of 77333 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
. In our order summarily affirming Brown’s judgment of conviction, we stated The final issue addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30037 - 2007-08-20
. In our order summarily affirming Brown’s judgment of conviction, we stated The final issue addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30037 - 2007-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
it does not appear that a judgment of conviction was ever entered to try to implement that unlawful second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89187 - 2012-11-13
it does not appear that a judgment of conviction was ever entered to try to implement that unlawful second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89187 - 2012-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
judgments regarding statutory interpretation. Id., ¶14. ¶8 Under great weight deference, we accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28725 - 2007-04-16
judgments regarding statutory interpretation. Id., ¶14. ¶8 Under great weight deference, we accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28725 - 2007-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
both the judgment of conviction and the order denying sentence modification. See State v. Storzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
both the judgment of conviction and the order denying sentence modification. See State v. Storzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31179 - 2014-09-15
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ricardo Glover
the judgment of conviction. More than seven years later, Glover filed a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2643 - 2017-09-19
the judgment of conviction. More than seven years later, Glover filed a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2643 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to reconsider which presents the same issues as those determined in the order or judgment sought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617315 - 2023-02-01
a motion to reconsider which presents the same issues as those determined in the order or judgment sought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617315 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Nos. 03-2508-CR 03-2509-CR 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6897 - 2017-09-20
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Nos. 03-2508-CR 03-2509-CR 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6897 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. ch. 980 context, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84949 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. ch. 980 context, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84949 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dale W. Repinski
and exercised reasonable professional judgment in making all significant decisions. Id. at 690. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10181 - 2005-03-31
and exercised reasonable professional judgment in making all significant decisions. Id. at 690. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10181 - 2005-03-31