Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7581 - 7590 of 68874 for he.
Search results 7581 - 7590 of 68874 for he.
[PDF]
City of Kiel v. Scott A. Halverson
.2d 819, 822, 271 N.W.2d 148, 150 (Ct. App. 1978). No. 98-2637-FT 3 he drove the motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14487 - 2017-09-21
.2d 819, 822, 271 N.W.2d 148, 150 (Ct. App. 1978). No. 98-2637-FT 3 he drove the motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14487 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David M. Beasley
)(1) and 161.41(1)(c)(1), STATS. Beasley presents two issues for review. First, he argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8155 - 2017-09-19
)(1) and 161.41(1)(c)(1), STATS. Beasley presents two issues for review. First, he argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8155 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel M. Faken
standard he or she used to measure the noise from the defendant’s vehicle. We reverse the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14244 - 2014-09-15
standard he or she used to measure the noise from the defendant’s vehicle. We reverse the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14244 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gerald W. Knudtson
of intentionally causing harm to a child, § 948.03(2)(b), STATS. He received concurrent prison terms of fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10977 - 2017-09-19
of intentionally causing harm to a child, § 948.03(2)(b), STATS. He received concurrent prison terms of fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10977 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel M. Faken
officer must be able to testify as to the objective standard he or she used to measure the noise from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14244 - 2005-03-31
officer must be able to testify as to the objective standard he or she used to measure the noise from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14244 - 2005-03-31
Timothy G. Whiteagle v. Anne E.W. Johnson
Johnson.[1] He further appeals the order taxing costs against him and his attorney after the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7607 - 2005-03-31
Johnson.[1] He further appeals the order taxing costs against him and his attorney after the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7607 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan V. Manke
. He argued that he was entitled to withdraw his plea because the State had breached the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14452 - 2005-03-31
. He argued that he was entitled to withdraw his plea because the State had breached the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14452 - 2005-03-31
Alphonso Hubanks v. Gary R. McCaughtry
orders denying his § 974.06, Stats., postconviction motion and his motion for reconsideration. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13241 - 2005-03-31
orders denying his § 974.06, Stats., postconviction motion and his motion for reconsideration. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric L. King
. The occupant of the truck identified himself and said that he had given his friend Eric a ride
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26361 - 2017-09-21
. The occupant of the truck identified himself and said that he had given his friend Eric a ride
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John R. Lootans
. Lootans raises two issues on appeal. First, he asserts that the State failed to show that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12333 - 2017-09-21
. Lootans raises two issues on appeal. First, he asserts that the State failed to show that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12333 - 2017-09-21