Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7581 - 7590 of 64286 for records/1000.
Search results 7581 - 7590 of 64286 for records/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and the rights of the public. State v. Spears, 227 Wis. 2d 495, 507, 596 N.W.2d 375 (1999). If the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52538 - 2014-09-15
, and the rights of the public. State v. Spears, 227 Wis. 2d 495, 507, 596 N.W.2d 375 (1999). If the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52538 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard Dakota
, in challenging defense counsel's effectiveness, Dakota argues, without citation to the record or authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13706 - 2005-03-31
, in challenging defense counsel's effectiveness, Dakota argues, without citation to the record or authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13706 - 2005-03-31
Karl Julius James v. Gary R. McCaughtry
the decision, and the records were correct. On December 19, 1996, James filed a circuit court certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12811 - 2005-03-31
the decision, and the records were correct. On December 19, 1996, James filed a circuit court certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12811 - 2005-03-31
State v. James M.C.
the facts of record with the factors in § 938.18(5), Stats., taking into account the protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13335 - 2005-03-31
the facts of record with the factors in § 938.18(5), Stats., taking into account the protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. App. 1979). Furthermore, the record supports Elizabeth’s assertion. ¶13 In Margaret H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85963 - 2014-09-15
. App. 1979). Furthermore, the record supports Elizabeth’s assertion. ¶13 In Margaret H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85963 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not allege sufficient facts, only presents conclusory allegations, or is refuted by the record, we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21
not allege sufficient facts, only presents conclusory allegations, or is refuted by the record, we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26
motion for reconsideration.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26
CA Blank Order
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Upon our independent review of the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Upon our independent review of the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
find that there is a substantial likelihood, based on [the subject’s] treatment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59693 - 2014-09-15
find that there is a substantial likelihood, based on [the subject’s] treatment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59693 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the offense with him on the Record. He also asserts that his counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
of the offense with him on the Record. He also asserts that his counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28