Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75821 - 75830 of 77517 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75821 - 75830 of 77517 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
. In our order summarily affirming Brown’s judgment of conviction, we stated The final issue addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30037 - 2007-08-20
. In our order summarily affirming Brown’s judgment of conviction, we stated The final issue addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30037 - 2007-08-20
CA Blank Order
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132654 - 2015-01-06
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132654 - 2015-01-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Brown, No. 2003AP2437-CRNM, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48910 - 2014-09-15
summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Brown, No. 2003AP2437-CRNM, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48910 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
offenses in a single judgment of conviction. The cocaine-marijuana-firearm case is Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40989 - 2014-09-15
offenses in a single judgment of conviction. The cocaine-marijuana-firearm case is Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40989 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pronouncement and a written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls.” State v. Ortiz, 2001 WI App 215, ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
pronouncement and a written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls.” State v. Ortiz, 2001 WI App 215, ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not grounds for an appeal or grounds to vacate any order, judgment, or commitment issued or entered under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207720 - 2018-01-25
is not grounds for an appeal or grounds to vacate any order, judgment, or commitment issued or entered under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207720 - 2018-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction and the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241926 - 2019-06-07
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction and the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241926 - 2019-06-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and entered the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Michael B. Brennan presided over numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29262 - 2014-09-15
, and entered the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Michael B. Brennan presided over numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29262 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment; and (4) there was substantial evidence upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15
and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment; and (4) there was substantial evidence upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15
Michael R. Luterbach v. Denise M. Luterbach
Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Under the parties' 1991 judgment of divorce, Patulski's 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10194 - 2005-03-31
Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Under the parties' 1991 judgment of divorce, Patulski's 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10194 - 2005-03-31