Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75871 - 75880 of 77531 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75871 - 75880 of 77531 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
State v. Rufus P. West
response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6361 - 2017-09-19
response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6361 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Nos. 03-2508-CR 03-2509-CR 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Nos. 03-2508-CR 03-2509-CR 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
summary judgment methodology, because Blanchar does not deny Strutzel’s averment that he never made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28456 - 2014-09-15
summary judgment methodology, because Blanchar does not deny Strutzel’s averment that he never made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28456 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael W. Slinker
the original Sheboygan County twenty-year judgment and sentence were vacated and Slinker was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3938 - 2005-03-31
the original Sheboygan County twenty-year judgment and sentence were vacated and Slinker was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3938 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and we summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v. Goins, No. 2021AP150-CRNM, unpublished
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1128820 - 2026-06-11
, and we summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v. Goins, No. 2021AP150-CRNM, unpublished
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1128820 - 2026-06-11
Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that the board might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4911 - 2005-03-31
will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that the board might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4911 - 2005-03-31
GMAC Mortgage Corporation of Pennsylvania v. Michael Gisvold
judgment was entered on April 26, 1993. Numerous foreclosure sales were scheduled and subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10943 - 2005-03-31
judgment was entered on April 26, 1993. Numerous foreclosure sales were scheduled and subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10943 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bradley Jones v. Judy Smith
. The habeas corpus petition does not challenge the validity of the judgments of conviction that resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4099 - 2017-09-20
. The habeas corpus petition does not challenge the validity of the judgments of conviction that resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4099 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Quinn Johnson
previous sentence. On direct appeal, this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6776 - 2017-09-20
previous sentence. On direct appeal, this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6776 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the judgment of conviction and as it appears in the caption of the prior appellate decision in his case. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92146 - 2014-09-15
on the judgment of conviction and as it appears in the caption of the prior appellate decision in his case. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92146 - 2014-09-15