Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7591 - 7600 of 63511 for records.
Search results 7591 - 7600 of 63511 for records.
State v. Linda J.
in this case will not be overturned if the record demonstrates that the trial court examined the pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12554 - 2005-03-31
in this case will not be overturned if the record demonstrates that the trial court examined the pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and on the record. (b) If the court determines that it is not in the interest of the defendant for it to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36518 - 2014-09-15
and on the record. (b) If the court determines that it is not in the interest of the defendant for it to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Linda J.
will not be overturned if the record demonstrates that the trial court examined the pertinent facts, applied the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12554 - 2017-09-21
will not be overturned if the record demonstrates that the trial court examined the pertinent facts, applied the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for resentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
denying his motion for resentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
State v. Jeffrey S. Amerson
in which a record was made and reflects that knowledge correctly,[2] and also under § 908.03(6), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12081 - 2005-03-31
in which a record was made and reflects that knowledge correctly,[2] and also under § 908.03(6), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record. Attached to the motion was a letter Hutchinson had written to the receivership court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221150 - 2018-10-10
the record. Attached to the motion was a letter Hutchinson had written to the receivership court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221150 - 2018-10-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[es] the record for reasons to sustain [the circuit court’s] exercise of discretion.” Id. (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244914 - 2019-08-08
[es] the record for reasons to sustain [the circuit court’s] exercise of discretion.” Id. (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244914 - 2019-08-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1903-CRNM 2 order from this court. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
. No. 2023AP1903-CRNM 2 order from this court. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
State v. Lorenzo H.
in this case will not be overturned if the record demonstrates that the trial court examined the pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31
in this case will not be overturned if the record demonstrates that the trial court examined the pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roy McGee
of an involuntary plea. We determine that the record conclusively establishes that McGee voluntarily, knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10207 - 2005-03-31
of an involuntary plea. We determine that the record conclusively establishes that McGee voluntarily, knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10207 - 2005-03-31