Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75921 - 75930 of 81623 for judges.
Search results 75921 - 75930 of 81623 for judges.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Richard J. Sankovitz, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Richard J. Sankovitz, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Richland County: Edward Leineweber, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33495 - 2008-07-23
of the circuit court for Richland County: Edward Leineweber, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33495 - 2008-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TIMOTHY G. DUGAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112167 - 2014-05-12
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TIMOTHY G. DUGAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112167 - 2014-05-12
CA Blank Order
had concluded that there was “no basis to appeal this ruling because ‘the trial judge is the ultimate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103349 - 2013-10-21
had concluded that there was “no basis to appeal this ruling because ‘the trial judge is the ultimate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103349 - 2013-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: michael t. kirchman, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Lundsten and Higginbotham, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49473 - 2010-04-28
: michael t. kirchman, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Lundsten and Higginbotham, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49473 - 2010-04-28
[PDF]
State v. Pedro Figueroa
an order of the circuit court for Racine County: EMILY S. MUELLER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18032 - 2017-09-21
an order of the circuit court for Racine County: EMILY S. MUELLER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18032 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Wood County: EDWARD F. ZAPPEN, JR., Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31090 - 2014-09-15
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Wood County: EDWARD F. ZAPPEN, JR., Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Strand
County: PAUL J. LENZ, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3906 - 2017-09-20
County: PAUL J. LENZ, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3906 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Paul Wozniak
. MCMAHON and JEFFREY A. KREMERS, Judges.1 Affirmed. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20
. MCMAHON and JEFFREY A. KREMERS, Judges.1 Affirmed. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20
State v. Tyler J. K.
, the trial court would be in a better position to judge whether the confidential pupil records would
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1235 - 2005-01-25
, the trial court would be in a better position to judge whether the confidential pupil records would
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1235 - 2005-01-25