Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75961 - 75970 of 77517 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75961 - 75970 of 77517 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
NOTICE
Claudio did not respond. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Claudio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34384 - 2014-09-15
Claudio did not respond. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Claudio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34384 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. That statute provides: “[i]f judgment be for the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall recover damages and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116156 - 2014-07-07
. That statute provides: “[i]f judgment be for the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall recover damages and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116156 - 2014-07-07
State v. Ricardo Glover
pursued his appeal pro se. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction. More than seven years later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2643 - 2005-03-31
pursued his appeal pro se. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction. More than seven years later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2643 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
regard for human life and directed that a judgment of acquittal be entered on the first-degree reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62366 - 2011-04-05
regard for human life and directed that a judgment of acquittal be entered on the first-degree reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62366 - 2011-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS
five years, during which time two children were born. A final judgment of divorce was entered on July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
five years, during which time two children were born. A final judgment of divorce was entered on July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
State v. Gerald D. Taylor
, again raising sentencing issues. We affirmed the judgment of conviction on July 19, 2002, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31
, again raising sentencing issues. We affirmed the judgment of conviction on July 19, 2002, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31179 - 2014-09-15
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a judgment of conviction was ever entered to try to implement that unlawful second sentence, Miller does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89187 - 2014-09-15
that a judgment of conviction was ever entered to try to implement that unlawful second sentence, Miller does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89187 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary E. Andrashko
an evidentiary hearing and by denying his discovery request. We affirm the trial court's order. The judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8579 - 2017-09-19
an evidentiary hearing and by denying his discovery request. We affirm the trial court's order. The judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8579 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jill A. Moore
] The State appeals an order vacating Jill Moore’s judgment of conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7218 - 2005-03-31
] The State appeals an order vacating Jill Moore’s judgment of conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7218 - 2005-03-31