Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 761 - 770 of 82816 for case search.
Search results 761 - 770 of 82816 for case search.
Frontsheet
, but the Fourth Amendment precluded their immediate search of the case without a warrant. 442 U.S. at 761, 766
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46694 - 2010-02-08
, but the Fourth Amendment precluded their immediate search of the case without a warrant. 442 U.S. at 761, 766
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46694 - 2010-02-08
[PDF]
WI 8
warrantless searches leading to the issuance of the search warrant in this case, namely: (1) Belsha's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46694 - 2014-09-15
warrantless searches leading to the issuance of the search warrant in this case, namely: (1) Belsha's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 100
the police affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant. The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122771 - 2014-11-11
the police affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant. The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122771 - 2014-11-11
State v. John C. Zittlow
in that case prior to the search. Zittlow’s reliance on State v. Malone, 2004 WI 108, ¶¶17, 34, 274 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25757 - 2006-07-04
in that case prior to the search. Zittlow’s reliance on State v. Malone, 2004 WI 108, ¶¶17, 34, 274 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25757 - 2006-07-04
State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§ DOC 328.22 (July 2013), went into effect after the search in this case. No. 2014AP753-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132848 - 2017-09-21
§ DOC 328.22 (July 2013), went into effect after the search in this case. No. 2014AP753-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132848 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
(July 2013), went into effect after the search in this case. [3] All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
(July 2013), went into effect after the search in this case. [3] All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
to the exclusionary rule: (1) Does the search warrant application in this case meet the third test set out in United
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20396 - 2005-11-22
to the exclusionary rule: (1) Does the search warrant application in this case meet the third test set out in United
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20396 - 2005-11-22
State v. Terry H. Redmond
automobile searches following a Terry[1] stop in two cases. The State maintains that the searches in both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12536 - 2005-03-31
automobile searches following a Terry[1] stop in two cases. The State maintains that the searches in both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12536 - 2005-03-31