Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 761 - 770 of 3822 for dollar.
Search results 761 - 770 of 3822 for dollar.
[PDF]
Civil disposition summary: Statewide
133 Claim Under Dollar Limit 7772 8931 1 1901 546 2978 3340 165 73 Replevin 340 443 0 141 16 126 148
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispostate18.pdf - 2019-02-26
133 Claim Under Dollar Limit 7772 8931 1 1901 546 2978 3340 165 73 Replevin 340 443 0 141 16 126 148
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispostate18.pdf - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rule petition 18-01 - Clerks of Court, District 6
for state-wide changes to improve efficiency/productivity or to save tax dollars. If this proposal
/supreme/docs/1801commentsraimer.pdf - 2018-02-08
for state-wide changes to improve efficiency/productivity or to save tax dollars. If this proposal
/supreme/docs/1801commentsraimer.pdf - 2018-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
required the court to collect a fee of twenty dollars and stated, “A defendant shall pay the costs, fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111136 - 2017-09-21
required the court to collect a fee of twenty dollars and stated, “A defendant shall pay the costs, fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111136 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of twenty-eight hundred dollar bills. On this appeal, McKinney argues that the totality of the circumstances
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103211 - 2013-10-16
of twenty-eight hundred dollar bills. On this appeal, McKinney argues that the totality of the circumstances
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103211 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
Larry George v. Grace Brown
authorizes prepayment only if the copying charge exceeds five dollars. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7813 - 2017-09-19
authorizes prepayment only if the copying charge exceeds five dollars. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7813 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rule Order
-hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to the Office of Lawyer Regulation for each application for admission
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137111 - 2017-09-21
-hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to the Office of Lawyer Regulation for each application for admission
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Tina L. Lamb v. Bruce A. Lamb
points out that the trial court specifically stated the car was worth $250 dollars when the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3218 - 2017-09-19
points out that the trial court specifically stated the car was worth $250 dollars when the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3218 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas Faust
of 26 U.S.C. § 125, entitled “Cafeteria Plans,” the company withheld pre-tax dollars from employee pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11048 - 2005-03-31
of 26 U.S.C. § 125, entitled “Cafeteria Plans,” the company withheld pre-tax dollars from employee pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11048 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn R. H.
dollars. Shawn was sixteen years old at the time. Shawn subsequently admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13405 - 2005-03-31
dollars. Shawn was sixteen years old at the time. Shawn subsequently admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13405 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Stannard
of 26 U.S.C. § 125, entitled “Cafeteria Plans,” the company withheld pre-tax dollars from employee pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
of 26 U.S.C. § 125, entitled “Cafeteria Plans,” the company withheld pre-tax dollars from employee pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31