Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 761 - 770 of 15294 for probate.
Search results 761 - 770 of 15294 for probate.
[PDF]
State v. James E. Gray
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
State v. James E. Gray
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
that statements made to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
that statements made to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
Koenig on three years of probation.2 Koenig’s probation was revoked on October 12, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
Koenig on three years of probation.2 Koenig’s probation was revoked on October 12, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges. Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13747 - 2014-09-15
to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges. Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13747 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Garrett A.B.
will place the juvenile on intensive probation--but if there is any violation of any of the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
will place the juvenile on intensive probation--but if there is any violation of any of the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
State v. Garrett A.B.
: If there is a violation--and the court will place the juvenile on intensive probation--but if there is any violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14068 - 2005-03-31
: If there is a violation--and the court will place the juvenile on intensive probation--but if there is any violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14068 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court order affirming the revocation of his probation on certiorari review. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
court order affirming the revocation of his probation on certiorari review. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
2015 OWI Guidelines District 5
. revocation IID-1 year No Probation Option Treatment: Good faith progress in qualified AODA
/publications/fees/docs/d5owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
. revocation IID-1 year No Probation Option Treatment: Good faith progress in qualified AODA
/publications/fees/docs/d5owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest plea, the State agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01
no contest plea, the State agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01