Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 761 - 770 of 2005 for restraints.
Search results 761 - 770 of 2005 for restraints.
CA Blank Order
” required genuine restraint or confinement, it did not need to be in a jail or prison. Thus, if Craven
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136553 - 2015-03-02
” required genuine restraint or confinement, it did not need to be in a jail or prison. Thus, if Craven
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136553 - 2015-03-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 940.225(3)(a); cf. Joseph E.G., 240 Wis. 2d 481, ¶12 (“Because the restraint or confinement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435177 - 2021-10-06
. STAT. § 940.225(3)(a); cf. Joseph E.G., 240 Wis. 2d 481, ¶12 (“Because the restraint or confinement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435177 - 2021-10-06
State v. Patrick C. Miller
considered himself or herself to be ‘in custody,’ given the degree of restraint under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6022 - 2005-03-31
considered himself or herself to be ‘in custody,’ given the degree of restraint under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6022 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roberta L. McCormick
N.W.2d 517. This restraint was not intended to be applied against the activities of private
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5735 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 517. This restraint was not intended to be applied against the activities of private
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5735 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Flick
N.W.2d 247, 250 (Ct. App. 1989). The trial court properly concluded that restraints on Flick's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14844 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 247, 250 (Ct. App. 1989). The trial court properly concluded that restraints on Flick's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14844 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether there was a formal arrest or a restraint on freedom of movement to a degree associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240033 - 2019-05-02
is whether there was a formal arrest or a restraint on freedom of movement to a degree associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240033 - 2019-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
extraordinary relief, it is available only where the petitioner demonstrates: (1) restraint of his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98825 - 2013-07-01
extraordinary relief, it is available only where the petitioner demonstrates: (1) restraint of his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98825 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
demonstrates: (1) restraint of his or her liberty; (2) that was imposed contrary to constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98825 - 2014-09-15
demonstrates: (1) restraint of his or her liberty; (2) that was imposed contrary to constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98825 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
himself “in custody,” given the degree of restraint under the circumstances. Id., 307 Wis. 2d 671, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36064 - 2009-04-01
himself “in custody,” given the degree of restraint under the circumstances. Id., 307 Wis. 2d 671, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36064 - 2009-04-01
[PDF]
: Mootness is a doctrine of judicial restraint. An issue is moot when its resolution will have no practical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395932 - 2021-07-22
: Mootness is a doctrine of judicial restraint. An issue is moot when its resolution will have no practical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395932 - 2021-07-22