Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7601 - 7610 of 73966 for public records.
Search results 7601 - 7610 of 73966 for public records.
State v. Thomas J. Becker
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10495 - 2005-03-31
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10495 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul R. Askew
years to nine years. Due to Askew’s minimal record, the circuit court sentenced him to probation. Two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13958 - 2005-03-31
years to nine years. Due to Askew’s minimal record, the circuit court sentenced him to probation. Two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159307 - 2017-09-21
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147480 - 2017-09-21
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136289 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136289 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP849-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205744 - 2017-12-20
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP849-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205744 - 2017-12-20
State v. Thomas J. Becker
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alejandro Rivera
of the record, together with the no merit report and response, we conclude that there exists no issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4140 - 2017-09-20
of the record, together with the no merit report and response, we conclude that there exists no issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4140 - 2017-09-20
State v. Alejandro Rivera
and the sentencing court’s discretion. Based upon our independent review of the record, together with the no merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4140 - 2005-03-31
and the sentencing court’s discretion. Based upon our independent review of the record, together with the no merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4140 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Kaitlin A. Lamb Assistant State Public Defender 735 N. Water St., Ste. 912 Milwaukee, WI 53202
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144923 - 2017-09-21
Kaitlin A. Lamb Assistant State Public Defender 735 N. Water St., Ste. 912 Milwaukee, WI 53202
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144923 - 2017-09-21