Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7601 - 7610 of 63486 for records.
Search results 7601 - 7610 of 63486 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Frankie G.
criteria: (a) The personality and prior record of the child, including whether the child is mentally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9350 - 2017-09-19
criteria: (a) The personality and prior record of the child, including whether the child is mentally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9350 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173808 - 2017-09-21
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173808 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Deborah Martin-Semrow v. Marc Raymond Semrow
. Because the purported assignment is not part of the record on appeal, and because the firm has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13612 - 2017-09-21
. Because the purported assignment is not part of the record on appeal, and because the firm has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[es] the record for reasons to sustain [the circuit court’s] exercise of discretion.” Id. (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244914 - 2019-08-08
[es] the record for reasons to sustain [the circuit court’s] exercise of discretion.” Id. (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244914 - 2019-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Linda J.
will not be overturned if the record demonstrates that the trial court examined the pertinent facts, applied the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12554 - 2017-09-21
will not be overturned if the record demonstrates that the trial court examined the pertinent facts, applied the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for resentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
denying his motion for resentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
record, and Mr. Stephens—at least my information is he has—he was charged with or convicted—it looks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02
record, and Mr. Stephens—at least my information is he has—he was charged with or convicted—it looks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
prior record. Nos. 2006AP1827-CR 2006AP1828-CR 4 Based on the defendant’s prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28618 - 2014-09-15
prior record. Nos. 2006AP1827-CR 2006AP1828-CR 4 Based on the defendant’s prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28618 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737176 - 2023-12-05
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737176 - 2023-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
the court to impose lesser sentences given the defendant’s prior record. Based on the defendant’s prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28618 - 2007-04-02
the court to impose lesser sentences given the defendant’s prior record. Based on the defendant’s prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28618 - 2007-04-02