Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7611 - 7620 of 15252 for mark's.
Search results 7611 - 7620 of 15252 for mark's.
COURT OF APPEALS
examiner’s decision “‘fall[s] appallingly short of the mark.’” See id., ¶21 (citation omitted). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58975 - 2011-01-18
examiner’s decision “‘fall[s] appallingly short of the mark.’” See id., ¶21 (citation omitted). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58975 - 2011-01-18
Lafayette County v. John L.N.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Lafayette County: MARK J. fARNUM, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12274 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Lafayette County: MARK J. fARNUM, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12274 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
695, 703, 524 N.W.2d 641 (1994) (citations and one set of quotation marks omitted). In State v. Radaj
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148198 - 2015-09-01
695, 703, 524 N.W.2d 641 (1994) (citations and one set of quotation marks omitted). In State v. Radaj
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148198 - 2015-09-01
Frontsheet
. The postal service returned the OLR's March 22, 2010 letter, marked "Return to Sender" and "Not Deliverable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82275 - 2012-06-27
. The postal service returned the OLR's March 22, 2010 letter, marked "Return to Sender" and "Not Deliverable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82275 - 2012-06-27
April Table of Unpublished Opinions
/05 Affirmed 04-2800-FT Mark Terpstra v
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18055 - 2005-05-09
/05 Affirmed 04-2800-FT Mark Terpstra v
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18055 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
marks and citation omitted). We will not overturn the verdict “[i]f any possibility exists
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122583 - 2014-09-23
marks and citation omitted). We will not overturn the verdict “[i]f any possibility exists
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122583 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
106, ¶25, 255 Wis. 2d 632, 648 N.W.2d 507 (citation and some quotation marks omitted). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715018 - 2023-10-17
106, ¶25, 255 Wis. 2d 632, 648 N.W.2d 507 (citation and some quotation marks omitted). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715018 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
marks omitted). We set aside an agency’s findings of fact “only when a reasonable trier of fact could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865003 - 2024-10-22
marks omitted). We set aside an agency’s findings of fact “only when a reasonable trier of fact could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865003 - 2024-10-22
State v. Roger Lenox
and forcefully rubbed her face into his genital area. The investigating officer observed red marks on her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4134 - 2005-03-31
and forcefully rubbed her face into his genital area. The investigating officer observed red marks on her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. [3] Judge Mark Gundrum heard and denied the suppression motion. [4] We note that Lutter does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103693 - 2013-10-30
. [3] Judge Mark Gundrum heard and denied the suppression motion. [4] We note that Lutter does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103693 - 2013-10-30