Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76131 - 76140 of 84464 for simple case search.
Search results 76131 - 76140 of 84464 for simple case search.
Francis J. Bradac v. Board of Review of Town of Farmington
review of statutory certiorari cases. See State ex rel. Ruthenberg v. Annuity & Pension Bd., 89 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9047 - 2005-03-31
review of statutory certiorari cases. See State ex rel. Ruthenberg v. Annuity & Pension Bd., 89 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9047 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101917 - 2017-09-21
WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101917 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96625 - 2013-05-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96625 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
State v. Shawn R. H.
in the crucial times of this case being pending, you ... ran away from Galow, you ran away from the acute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13405 - 2017-09-21
in the crucial times of this case being pending, you ... ran away from Galow, you ran away from the acute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13405 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶4 When sentencing Duncan, the circuit court in the present case found him ineligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115583 - 2014-06-30
. ¶4 When sentencing Duncan, the circuit court in the present case found him ineligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115583 - 2014-06-30
CA Blank Order
. The sentence was within the maximum sentence Broesch faced and, given the facts of this case, there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
. The sentence was within the maximum sentence Broesch faced and, given the facts of this case, there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446012 - 2021-10-27
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446012 - 2021-10-27
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lee Erlandson
2005 WI 143 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP2623-D COMPLETE
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20058 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 143 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP2623-D COMPLETE
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20058 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238122 - 2019-03-26
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238122 - 2019-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), and we decline to do that in this case. ¶10 Next, Mey argues that we should reverse under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144514 - 2017-09-21
), and we decline to do that in this case. ¶10 Next, Mey argues that we should reverse under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144514 - 2017-09-21