Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76171 - 76180 of 84464 for simple case search.
Search results 76171 - 76180 of 84464 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
of Gleason’s probation in a separate case. The court concluded a “significant” period of incarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100721 - 2013-08-12
of Gleason’s probation in a separate case. The court concluded a “significant” period of incarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100721 - 2013-08-12
[PDF]
State v. Robert T. Langston
time is not an element in a sexual assault case, the State would not have been required to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11319 - 2017-09-19
time is not an element in a sexual assault case, the State would not have been required to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11319 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jamie D. Jardine
to the crux of the State’s case. The new allegations appear to be particularly relevant to the sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3725 - 2005-03-31
to the crux of the State’s case. The new allegations appear to be particularly relevant to the sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789710 - 2024-04-17
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789710 - 2024-04-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶10. ¶8 We conclude that Sauceda controls this case. In Sauceda, the child alleged that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84313 - 2014-09-15
., ¶10. ¶8 We conclude that Sauceda controls this case. In Sauceda, the child alleged that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84313 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606134 - 2022-12-30
. Given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606134 - 2022-12-30
State v. David Z. Williams
because he did not know he had been charged in that case. Because he did not invoke his Sixth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16052 - 2005-03-31
because he did not know he had been charged in that case. Because he did not invoke his Sixth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16052 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
at the postconviction hearing that he believed he had won the case and that he feared putting Barnekow through cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13453 - 2005-03-31
at the postconviction hearing that he believed he had won the case and that he feared putting Barnekow through cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13453 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
subject to the commitment order, the case is rendered moot). Moreover, the record reflects that V.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209221 - 2018-03-07
subject to the commitment order, the case is rendered moot). Moreover, the record reflects that V.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209221 - 2018-03-07
State v. David T. O.
jurisdiction over the case to dismiss the action with prejudice, to waive its jurisdiction under s. 48.18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12148 - 2005-03-31
jurisdiction over the case to dismiss the action with prejudice, to waive its jurisdiction under s. 48.18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12148 - 2005-03-31