Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76191 - 76200 of 77300 for judgment for u s.
Search results 76191 - 76200 of 77300 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
, this court affirmed the judgments of conviction. See State v. Sharp, Nos. 2002AP2114-CRNM & 2002AP2115-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123832 - 2014-10-13
, this court affirmed the judgments of conviction. See State v. Sharp, Nos. 2002AP2114-CRNM & 2002AP2115-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123832 - 2014-10-13
[PDF]
Mary McKnight v. Teachers Retirement Board of Wisconsin
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable, representing its will rather than its judgment, and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2943 - 2017-09-19
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable, representing its will rather than its judgment, and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2943 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jonathan V. Manke
judgment vacated and defendant remanded to Ozaukee County Jail pending resentencing. …. I do find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14452 - 2005-03-31
judgment vacated and defendant remanded to Ozaukee County Jail pending resentencing. …. I do find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14452 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121061 - 2014-09-15
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121061 - 2014-09-15
Payne & Dolan, Inc. v. Dane County
their will and not their judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that they could reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15804 - 2005-03-31
their will and not their judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that they could reasonably make the order or determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment as to the weight or credibility of the evidence. WIS. STAT. §§ 102.23(1)(a) and 102.23(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34626 - 2014-09-15
judgment as to the weight or credibility of the evidence. WIS. STAT. §§ 102.23(1)(a) and 102.23(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34626 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a $250 fine. At the same time, according to the judgment roll, the trial court denied a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97429 - 2014-09-15
a $250 fine. At the same time, according to the judgment roll, the trial court denied a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97429 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 227.57(8). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the Commission on an issue of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1067533 - 2026-01-28
. § 227.57(8). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the Commission on an issue of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1067533 - 2026-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Darrell J. Shearer
to the physical tests, there are field sobriety tests commonly referred to, judgment in the case, driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3739 - 2017-09-19
to the physical tests, there are field sobriety tests commonly referred to, judgment in the case, driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3739 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and subsequently entered judgment against Griswold. This court affirmed that decision in an opinion dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104347 - 2017-09-21
and subsequently entered judgment against Griswold. This court affirmed that decision in an opinion dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104347 - 2017-09-21