Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7621 - 7630 of 68502 for did.
Search results 7621 - 7630 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
seven issues: (1) Did Fleming’s acquittal on sexual assault charges preclude the State from pursuing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132741 - 2017-09-21
seven issues: (1) Did Fleming’s acquittal on sexual assault charges preclude the State from pursuing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132741 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a repeat offender. We conclude that Fowler did and, therefore, affirm the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190581 - 2017-09-21
as a repeat offender. We conclude that Fowler did and, therefore, affirm the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190581 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and visits occurred jointly with Everett’s father. She testified, though, that she did not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611577 - 2023-01-18
and visits occurred jointly with Everett’s father. She testified, though, that she did not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611577 - 2023-01-18
State v. Yolanda McClinton
assistance of counsel. McClinton contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he did not request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9943 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel. McClinton contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he did not request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9943 - 2005-03-31
Diane Marie Biever v. Nicholas Joseph Biever
of LaRocque, 139 Wis. 2d at 33. ¶5 On appeal, Nick argues that the court did not set out its reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15117 - 2005-03-31
of LaRocque, 139 Wis. 2d at 33. ¶5 On appeal, Nick argues that the court did not set out its reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dean A. Molzner
, the Molzners were not entitled to withdraw their guilty pleas because the court did not inform them that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15090 - 2017-09-21
, the Molzners were not entitled to withdraw their guilty pleas because the court did not inform them that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15090 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop. The officer did not notice Keenan-Becht’s vehicle swerving or any issues with it while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550968 - 2022-08-03
stop. The officer did not notice Keenan-Becht’s vehicle swerving or any issues with it while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550968 - 2022-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that they are not vicariously liable for Diane’s alleged negligence because they did not exercise the requisite degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210817 - 2018-04-10
that they are not vicariously liable for Diane’s alleged negligence because they did not exercise the requisite degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210817 - 2018-04-10
Certification
. The circuit court granted the motion to dismiss. It did so based on Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50, 261 Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80350 - 2012-04-03
. The circuit court granted the motion to dismiss. It did so based on Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50, 261 Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80350 - 2012-04-03
COURT OF APPEALS
represented himself because he did not meet the State Public Defender’s indigency criteria. Blunt asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103670 - 2013-11-05
represented himself because he did not meet the State Public Defender’s indigency criteria. Blunt asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103670 - 2013-11-05