Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7621 - 7630 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 7621 - 7630 of 12464 for mr.
State v. Donny Rogers
, the district attorney has produced no evidence that the defendant, in his alleged admissions to Mr. Martin, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7968 - 2005-03-31
, the district attorney has produced no evidence that the defendant, in his alleged admissions to Mr. Martin, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7968 - 2005-03-31
Anne Marie Rosplock v. David Rosplock
that [Anne] has had a live-in relationship with a Mr. Gumina in 1994, 1995 and into April of 1996. Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11816 - 2005-03-31
that [Anne] has had a live-in relationship with a Mr. Gumina in 1994, 1995 and into April of 1996. Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11816 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Fritz, Jr.
a stayed prison sentence, and probation. I would ask that as a condition of his probation, Mr. Fritz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11059 - 2005-03-31
a stayed prison sentence, and probation. I would ask that as a condition of his probation, Mr. Fritz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11059 - 2005-03-31
State v. Benard Treadwell
then stated: “You understand that, Mr. Treadwell?” to which Treadwell replied, “Yes, Ma’am.” Later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12165 - 2013-09-18
then stated: “You understand that, Mr. Treadwell?” to which Treadwell replied, “Yes, Ma’am.” Later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12165 - 2013-09-18
2006 WI APP 181
Douglas: Q. Mr. Demmerly, from the time of your arrest, from July 3rd of 1993 and July 11th of 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26175 - 2006-08-08
Douglas: Q. Mr. Demmerly, from the time of your arrest, from July 3rd of 1993 and July 11th of 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26175 - 2006-08-08
CA Blank Order
to represent himself and that “it wouldn’t make a difference which attorney was sitting next to Mr. Luckett, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103235 - 2013-10-16
to represent himself and that “it wouldn’t make a difference which attorney was sitting next to Mr. Luckett, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103235 - 2013-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of things that Mr. Tamms might have said to this officer as to the things that he did, she would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46286 - 2012-11-15
of things that Mr. Tamms might have said to this officer as to the things that he did, she would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46286 - 2012-11-15
[PDF]
WI APP 85
for it. That isn’t negative, and, Mr. Betters, you’re not an unintelligent person. I mean you’ve addressed me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98141 - 2017-09-21
for it. That isn’t negative, and, Mr. Betters, you’re not an unintelligent person. I mean you’ve addressed me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sylvia A. Shovers v. Gary D. Shovers
that technically is not before me. What is before me is whether or not Mrs. [Shovers] had a claim, and she does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24778 - 2017-09-21
that technically is not before me. What is before me is whether or not Mrs. [Shovers] had a claim, and she does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recordings, jail phone call recordings, that Mr. Hawthorne is guilty of first degree recklessly endangering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141476 - 2017-09-21
recordings, jail phone call recordings, that Mr. Hawthorne is guilty of first degree recklessly endangering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141476 - 2017-09-21