Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7621 - 7630 of 63956 for records.
Search results 7621 - 7630 of 63956 for records.
State v. Ralph C. Haralson
. Upon consideration of the report, the response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8500 - 2005-03-31
. Upon consideration of the report, the response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8500 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
made mention now twice of the fact that our voices have been cutting out. The record should reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33121 - 2014-09-15
made mention now twice of the fact that our voices have been cutting out. The record should reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33121 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
this argument to encompass a variety of legal issues inapplicable to the record facts of this case, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109841 - 2014-04-02
this argument to encompass a variety of legal issues inapplicable to the record facts of this case, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109841 - 2014-04-02
Manitowoc County v. Leesa J.Y.
review of the record, we conclude that Leesa waived her right to challenge the juvenile court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31
review of the record, we conclude that Leesa waived her right to challenge the juvenile court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
State v. Frank Machado
the motion in May 1994. The record on appeal does not contain a transcript of proceedings apparently held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7858 - 2005-03-31
the motion in May 1994. The record on appeal does not contain a transcript of proceedings apparently held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7858 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for resentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
denying his motion for resentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
insists in her brief to this court that “[n]umerous things in the record give rise to competing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50850 - 2014-09-15
insists in her brief to this court that “[n]umerous things in the record give rise to competing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50850 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131327 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131327 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not have committed the charged crime. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=430580 - 2021-09-28
not have committed the charged crime. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=430580 - 2021-09-28