Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76221 - 76230 of 91841 for 1.
Search results 76221 - 76230 of 91841 for 1.
CA Blank Order
no contest plea or challenge the sentence imposed for fifth or sixth offense operating while intoxicated.[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108208 - 2014-02-18
no contest plea or challenge the sentence imposed for fifth or sixth offense operating while intoxicated.[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108208 - 2014-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2021-22) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Crawford was sent a copy of the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858345 - 2024-10-10
(2021-22) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Crawford was sent a copy of the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858345 - 2024-10-10
State v. Larry A. Tollefson
. VERGERONT, J.[1] Appointed counsel for Larry A. Tollefson, Attorney Margaret A. Maroney, has filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2005-03-31
. VERGERONT, J.[1] Appointed counsel for Larry A. Tollefson, Attorney Margaret A. Maroney, has filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel D. Drow v. David H. Schwarz
because it was not the court of conviction. We agree and therefore reverse and remand. 1 Drow pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12686 - 2017-09-21
because it was not the court of conviction. We agree and therefore reverse and remand. 1 Drow pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22);1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759177 - 2024-01-31
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22);1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759177 - 2024-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. William Walter Speener, pro se, appeals from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92964 - 2013-02-19
, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. William Walter Speener, pro se, appeals from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92964 - 2013-02-19
CA Blank Order
) Before Hoover, P.J.[1] Counsel for Omar R. filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100248 - 2013-08-05
) Before Hoover, P.J.[1] Counsel for Omar R. filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100248 - 2013-08-05
State v. Eldwin E. Buelow
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eldwin Buelow appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5888 - 2005-03-31
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eldwin Buelow appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5888 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Alex D. Keeton appeals judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58775 - 2011-01-10
. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Alex D. Keeton appeals judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58775 - 2011-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 In Eau Claire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448250 - 2021-11-02
, the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 In Eau Claire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448250 - 2021-11-02