Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7631 - 7640 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 7631 - 7640 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
court refused to delay the trial to allow for the production of a defense witness in the State’s custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29105 - 2007-05-21
court refused to delay the trial to allow for the production of a defense witness in the State’s custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29105 - 2007-05-21
State v. Kevin D. Jennings
an order denying his postconviction motion. Jennings claims that the trial court erred when it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3647 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion. Jennings claims that the trial court erred when it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals a judgment convicting him on two burglary counts. He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31944 - 2014-09-15
appeals a judgment convicting him on two burglary counts. He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a defense witness in the State’s custody. Muhammad further contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29105 - 2014-09-15
of a defense witness in the State’s custody. Muhammad further contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29105 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him on two burglary counts. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31944 - 2008-02-25
convicting him on two burglary counts. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31944 - 2008-02-25
Constance Wolfgram v. Lewis E. Olson
. Olson argues that the trial court: (1) should have granted his motion to dismiss after the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11247 - 2005-03-31
. Olson argues that the trial court: (1) should have granted his motion to dismiss after the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11247 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Constance Wolfgram v. Lewis E. Olson
: (1) should have granted his motion to dismiss after the plaintiff had rested; (2) should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11247 - 2017-09-19
: (1) should have granted his motion to dismiss after the plaintiff had rested; (2) should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11247 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
who were involved in the review of Musgraves’s custody classification level. Musgraves filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197059 - 2017-09-25
who were involved in the review of Musgraves’s custody classification level. Musgraves filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197059 - 2017-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: (a) The individual has a primary need for residential care and custody. (b) The individual is a minor who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560191 - 2022-09-01
: (a) The individual has a primary need for residential care and custody. (b) The individual is a minor who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560191 - 2022-09-01
[MS WORD]
JD-1790: Order for Change in Placement (Out-of-Home to Out-of-Home Placement Only)
a |_| temporary physical custody order. |_| dispositional order. 2. The provisions of the Indian
/formdisplay/JD-1790.doc?formNumber=JD-1790&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-24
a |_| temporary physical custody order. |_| dispositional order. 2. The provisions of the Indian
/formdisplay/JD-1790.doc?formNumber=JD-1790&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-24