Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7631 - 7640 of 68468 for did.

State v. Yolanda McClinton
assistance of counsel. McClinton contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he did not request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9943 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that they are not vicariously liable for Diane’s alleged negligence because they did not exercise the requisite degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210817 - 2018-04-10

James Olson v. Auto Sport, Inc.
of Auto Sport at the time of his death and that Auto Sport did not permit James to work at an employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4544 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael J. Moran
. On appeal, Moran argues that he did not refuse the test because his diabetic condition rendered him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12619 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to support the trial court finding that Wilt was guilty of OWI and because the trial court did not allude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73110 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. Jordan’s attorney did not object. ¶7 Jordan argues Fruzen’s testimony, along with the booking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42082 - 2009-10-13

WI App 88 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1808-CR Complete Tit...
. Because we conclude that the prosecutor’s comments did not materially and substantially breach the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97997 - 2013-07-30

State v. Lawrence J. Fields
the intersection, he noticed a northbound vehicle stopped at the stop sign on Van Boxtel. He did not recall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2383 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kevin S. Schatzke
first stated he did not want to talk, he ultimately signed a rights waiver. Ostermeier questioned him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4811 - 2005-03-31

Certification
. The circuit court granted the motion to dismiss. It did so based on Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50, 261 Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80350 - 2012-04-03