Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7631 - 7640 of 68466 for did.
Search results 7631 - 7640 of 68466 for did.
State v. Tyrone Rimmer
). Rimmer filed a motion to suppress the cocaine on grounds that the police did not have valid consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19092 - 2005-07-25
). Rimmer filed a motion to suppress the cocaine on grounds that the police did not have valid consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19092 - 2005-07-25
State v. Jack Williams
Mills removed or displayed his weapon before he was shot. The State argued that he did not, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9559 - 2005-03-31
Mills removed or displayed his weapon before he was shot. The State argued that he did not, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9559 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patricia LaBelle
guilt for theft of movable property. Because LaBelle’s inculpatory statement did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13704 - 2005-03-31
guilt for theft of movable property. Because LaBelle’s inculpatory statement did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13704 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 58
the outstanding remodeling work and Rembalski indicated he would not pay the agreed-upon price. Plewa did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718520 - 2023-12-19
the outstanding remodeling work and Rembalski indicated he would not pay the agreed-upon price. Plewa did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718520 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Tyrone Rimmer
filed a motion to suppress the cocaine on grounds that the police did not have valid consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19092 - 2017-09-21
filed a motion to suppress the cocaine on grounds that the police did not have valid consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19092 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
colloquy (i.e., a Bangert violation), and further alleges that he did not understand the omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26845 - 2006-10-18
colloquy (i.e., a Bangert violation), and further alleges that he did not understand the omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26845 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
Diane Marie Biever v. Nicholas Joseph Biever
On appeal, Nick argues that the court did not set out its reasons for awarding maintenance to Diane. Nick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15651 - 2017-09-21
On appeal, Nick argues that the court did not set out its reasons for awarding maintenance to Diane. Nick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15651 - 2017-09-21
State v. Trammel V. Johnson
it allegedly did not consider “a very harsh sentence” he received in another robbery case. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5528 - 2005-03-31
it allegedly did not consider “a very harsh sentence” he received in another robbery case. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5528 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 88
that the prosecutor’s comments did not materially and substantially breach the plea agreement and, therefore, Wood’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
that the prosecutor’s comments did not materially and substantially breach the plea agreement and, therefore, Wood’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Diane Marie Biever v. Nicholas Joseph Biever
On appeal, Nick argues that the court did not set out its reasons for awarding maintenance to Diane. Nick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15117 - 2017-09-21
On appeal, Nick argues that the court did not set out its reasons for awarding maintenance to Diane. Nick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15117 - 2017-09-21