Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7641 - 7650 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 7641 - 7650 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
before a court commissioner. The commissioner decided paternity, custody, placement, and child support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104964 - 2017-09-21
before a court commissioner. The commissioner decided paternity, custody, placement, and child support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104964 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
/evidentiary hearing before a court commissioner. The commissioner decided paternity, custody, placement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104964 - 2013-12-03
/evidentiary hearing before a court commissioner. The commissioner decided paternity, custody, placement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104964 - 2013-12-03
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Veronica J.
an order denying her motion for immediate return of her children, Stephanie S., Connie C. and Whitney J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8973 - 2017-09-19
an order denying her motion for immediate return of her children, Stephanie S., Connie C. and Whitney J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8973 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jack L. B.
. Jack B. appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31
. Jack B. appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee County v. Veronica J.
order and from an order denying her motion for immediate return of her children, Stephanie S., Connie C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8973 - 2005-03-31
order and from an order denying her motion for immediate return of her children, Stephanie S., Connie C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8973 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2017
or his offense.” A motion for reconsideration was denied. The Court of Appeals ultimately agreed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199619 - 2017-11-03
or his offense.” A motion for reconsideration was denied. The Court of Appeals ultimately agreed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199619 - 2017-11-03
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
the 2020 Wisconsin Constitutional Amendment to lodge legal arguments in opposition to a defendant's motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665230 - 2023-06-02
the 2020 Wisconsin Constitutional Amendment to lodge legal arguments in opposition to a defendant's motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665230 - 2023-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his motion for reconsideration.2 Thad contends that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990025 - 2025-07-29
and from an order denying his motion for reconsideration.2 Thad contends that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990025 - 2025-07-29
Glinder Drake v. Marcia E. Huber
Huber’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed against her by Glinder Drake, or alternatively, to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11569 - 2005-03-31
Huber’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed against her by Glinder Drake, or alternatively, to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11569 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion in limine to exclude some of the audio recording of his confession because, according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101254 - 2017-09-21
a motion in limine to exclude some of the audio recording of his confession because, according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101254 - 2017-09-21