Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7641 - 7650 of 36146 for certificate of divorced.

[PDF] Elizabeth H. v. Malcolm H.
. With that modification, we affirm the trial court’s exercise of discretion. The parties divorced in October 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11377 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Henderson. Id., ¶1. At the time Richardson filed this small claims action in Ozaukee county, the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60822 - 2011-03-08

COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. John Matousek appeals from a post-divorce order denying his motion to modify his children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54736 - 2010-09-22

[PDF] Keith P. Herlitzke v. Jolene M. Herlitzke
. Jolene Herlitzke appeals a judgment divorcing her from Keith Herlitzke after more than twenty years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6752 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
a post-divorce order that denied his motion for contempt against his ex-wife, Jane Roska, and modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47611 - 2010-03-03

State v. Rueben Gantt
in June 1972, whose support is the subject of this appeal. When Gantt and his wife were divorced in 1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9642 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Carol Nortunen’s then-husband for a residence in Kenosha. Following Nortunen’s divorce, she became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194671 - 2017-09-21

Melanie Guth v. Timothy Guth
reject her argument and affirm the order. ¶2 In 1999, Melanie filed a petition for divorce seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3846 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Karen A. Lloyd v. Daniel J. Lloyd
in accord with this opinion. BACKGROUND At the time of their divorce, the parties stipulated that Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14627 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Debra A. Hoffman v. John C. Hoffman
., and Sundby, J. SUNDBY, J. Debra A. Hoffman began this divorce action January 2, 1992. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7691 - 2017-09-19